History of Minority Populations in the Child Welfare System of the United States Essay

Article 1Love, C. (2005). Not in our province? A critique of the United States welf argon system through the genus Lens of Chinas one churl policy. Columbia Journal of sexuality and Law, 14(2). 142-174. Retrieved May 21, 2010.The article mainly focuses on the Family Planning Law in China and the laws in the United States regarding society wellbeing. Both the countries aim to cash in ones chips poverty from the societies and encourage development and growth. The author of the article believes that some tike laws have been violated in achieving a level of success in implementing upbeat laws. Despite the efforts of the government, the people living below the poverty literary argument are increasing each day in both the countries.The children are punished for the decisions of their parents as they do non have a demote formal identification. The cap on the family size in the United States law-makers does not allow a woman to bear as legion(predicate) children as she wishes. T he government supports children in a family to a certain limit. However, aft(prenominal) the reproductive cap has been crossed, the government does not provide all benefits to the child who has been born afterward the cap was crossed. These limitations on the reproductive choice of a woman demonstrate that the system if full of issues and inequalities. This is because the child who is born after the reproduction cap is not entitled to the support from the government that new(prenominal) children are enjoying.Article 2Raghavan, R., Inoue, M., Ettner, S., Hamilton, B., & Landsverk, J. (2010). A Preliminary Analysis of the admit of Mental Health Services Consistent With National Standards Among tykeren in the tike Welfare System.American Journal of Public Health,100(4), 742-749. Retrieved May 21, 2010 from Psychology and behavioral Sciences Collection data.In this article, the authors perform a research to find let on whether the children in the child welfare system of the Uni ted States receive kind health care as the others receive. Data from the past three days was used to conduct the research and study. This data was collected from the National analyze for Child and Adolescent well-being. The sample size consisted of 3,802 individuals. The results showed that only half of the make out sample size received mental health care that was lucid with a single subject field standard. However, there were only 10% of the do sample were fortunate enough to get health care which was reconciled with all of the national standards. It was also found out that the older children were more than likely to attract mental health care which is consistent with the national standards. Therefore the article concludes with the fact that the child welfare system in the Unites States is not working fairly and those who need the support are not getting it.Article 3Dettlaff, A., de Haymes, M., Velazquez, S., Mindell, R., & Bruce, L. (2009). Emerging Issues at the Intersec tion of in-migration and Child Welfare Results from a Transnational Research and Policy Forum.Child Welfare,88(2), 47-67. Retrieved May 21, 2010, from Education Research Complete database.The authors of this article intend to conk out the issues related to child welfare system that an immigrant family has to face while miserable to the United States. Child permanency, safety and well being have sour the major concerns of a family moving to the United States. The increasing numbers of immigrants in the past few years suggest an increase in strive and interaction with the child welfare system, but the numbers of immigrant children involved with the welfare system have not been measured.The author of the article also believes that the immigrant children are more likely to live in poverty than the children of the natives. Moreover the authors weaken that the immigrant families in the United States are less likely to receive any financial benefits than the natives. The children that are related to the immigrant families are more likely to drop health insurance coverage than the native ones. These discrepancies in the child welfare system exist due to the fact that the parents of these immigrant children also do not have access to the benefits that a normal American would enjoy.